This ruling underscores the necessity of superior religion and diligent prosecution in asserting pre-emption rights. The Court maintained that a co-sharer with symbolic possession can defend their rights and that the execution of partition need to consider the particular conditions and authorized boundaries in the property (2024 MLD sixty one). https://erickqqreu.blogminds.com/5-simple-statements-about-nuisance-and-land-use-lawyer-in-karachi-explained-28747633